<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Alex Peters &#187; Debian Etch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alexpeters.net/tag/debian-etch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alexpeters.net</link>
	<description>Another faceless entity, another collection of musings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:15:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Heads up: Apache 1.3 removed from Debian</title>
		<link>http://alexpeters.net/2008/10/no-apache-1-3-for-debian/</link>
		<comments>http://alexpeters.net/2008/10/no-apache-1-3-for-debian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apache 1.3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apache 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Backporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debian Etch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debian Lenny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mod_perl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://byandar.wordpress.com/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you upgraded your Debian installation from Etch to Lenny?  I have.  Are you somewhat surprised to find things breaking because the apache-perl binary has disappeared?  I was. The simple answer according to Debian bug #496497 is that Apache 1.3 has been removed.  Debian Etch appears to be the last distribution to support it. To [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you upgraded your <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian">Debian</a> installation from Etch to Lenny?  I have.  Are you somewhat surprised to find things breaking because the <tt>apache-perl</tt> binary has disappeared?  I was.</p>
<p><span id="more-6"></span></p>
<p>The simple answer according to <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=496497">Debian bug #496497</a> is that Apache 1.3 has been removed.  Debian Etch appears to be the last distribution to support it.</p>
<p><a href="http://byandar.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/surprised_girl.jpeg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-8" title="Surprised girl" src="http://alexpeters.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/surprised_girl.jpeg?w=300" alt="Surprised girl" width="300" height="273" /></a></p>
<p>To me, this is a surprise.  Surely Apache 1.3 is still used heavily in production around the world.  The possibility that it could be at this point of abandonment&#8212;the point of not even offering it in packages&#8212;didn&#8217;t even occur to me.  That&#8217;s why I wasted so much time trying to &#8220;un-break&#8221; my installation.</p>
<p>So in short, if your code base relies on Apache 1.3 and you upgrade from Etch, you&#8217;re out of luck.  You need to roll back, or possibly compile and install everything by hand, or start looking at migrating from Apache 1.3 to Apache 2.0.  <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=482648">Bug #482648</a> offers a temporary workaround which I&#8217;ve not yet tried.</p>
<p>I have mixed feelings about this.  In a way it&#8217;s probably good that the migration from 1.3 to 2.0 is being forced upon us.  In another way though, how does one propose this migration to higher business powers in a way that doesn&#8217;t sound like a complete waste of resources?</p>
<p>At worst, managers reject the migration and developers are stuck with Etch.  But then with the exception of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backporting">backported</a> packages, all future improvements to Debian are essentially immaterial.  Should a code base ever lock things down to that degree?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alexpeters.net/2008/10/no-apache-1-3-for-debian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

