<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Alex Peters &#187; ID3 tags</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alexpeters.net/tag/id3-tags/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alexpeters.net</link>
	<description>Another faceless entity, another collection of musings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:06:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>I wish I could tag my music like I tag my photos</title>
		<link>http://alexpeters.net/2009/i-wish-i-could-tag-my-music-like-i-tag-my-photos/</link>
		<comments>http://alexpeters.net/2009/i-wish-i-could-tag-my-music-like-i-tag-my-photos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 05:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethiopian music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-Spot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ID3 tags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP3s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Playlists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tags]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://byandar.wordpress.com/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The software I use to manage my photos is awesome; everything essentially sits in a single folder with no special naming, and the photos have &#8220;tags&#8221; (like Alex, Footscray, Kebabbage, Engrish, Moustache) associated with them.  No need to organise photos by their single most prominent trait; you can slap on as many tags as you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://f-spot.org/Main_Page">The software I use to manage my photos</a> is awesome; everything essentially sits in a single folder with no special naming, and the photos have &#8220;tags&#8221; (like <em>Alex</em>, <em>Footscray</em>, <em>Kebabbage</em>, <em>Engrish</em>, <em>Moustache</em>) associated with them.  No need to organise photos by their single most prominent trait; you can slap on as many tags as you like.</p>
<p>Finding photos is simple; you just work out what tags are relevant and then form a search query out of them: <em>get me all photos taken within Balwyn featuring my two sisters, myself and a wheel of Brie&#8212;but no possums</em>.   If you&#8217;ve been prudent with your tagging when you add photos, this works perfectly every time.</p>
<p>I wish the same could be done for music.<span id="more-30"></span></p>
<p>So MP3s have ID3 tags, and any decent music software will recognise these.  But they&#8217;re not totally arbitrary; you get to store an artist, an album, a title, a genre and some other crap.  If you want to associate something else to an MP3, like &#8220;this was a favourite of mine in 2008&#8243; or &#8220;this song features Ethiopian lyrics,&#8221; ID3 tags won&#8217;t help you.</p>
<p>But playlists might.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say you had a bunch of playlists set up to signify such things, like <em>2008 Favourites</em>, <em>Ethiopian Lyrics</em> and <em>Never Play These Automatically</em>.  You could then easily inspect these lists to see what songs fall under these criteria, and you could double-click a playlist to listen to them.</p>
<p>Playlists are more of a one-way relationship though.  A playlist points to songs within it.  Existing software, to my knowledge, doesn&#8217;t look at a song and tell you the playlists to which it belongs.  Therefore, you couldn&#8217;t pick up a song in your collection and automatically be told that you stole it from Dan, it hails from Mongolia and it should always automatically be copied to your car&#8217;s music player.  Which means that when you identify a song as satisfying a certain criterion, you can&#8217;t easily know whether the appropriate playlist already reflects this.  So you unconditionally add it anyway, and because they&#8217;re <em>lists</em> and not <em>sets</em>, your playlists then contain repeated entries.</p>
<p>Authors of some software recognise that most people want this in a more limited sense: ratings.  They then all go about their own way in storing some number of stars alongside each song in one&#8217;s collection (it certainly doesn&#8217;t seem to go into the ID3 tag).</p>
<p>To me though, such a rating system is pretty useless.  Sure, I could default all my tracks to 3 stars and assign one star to anything I never want to hear but don&#8217;t have the heart to delete.  But would I do anything else?  If I started assigning four or five stars to songs I really like <em>at this point in time</em>, what happens when my tastes inevitably change?  The ratings aren&#8217;t going to be constant.  I&#8217;ll just be twiddling with ratings all the time.</p>
<p>And when I&#8217;m looking for songs in Amharic, besides searching for a few obvious artists, ratings certainly won&#8217;t help.</p>
<p>I wonder if I&#8217;m the only person who thinks this way&#8212;that tags could be applied to so much more than just photos&#8212;and if not, how long it will be before they can be used elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alexpeters.net/2009/i-wish-i-could-tag-my-music-like-i-tag-my-photos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

